Journal Article Employment and the National Dividend Get access F. W. Taussig F. W. Taussig Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 51, Issue 1, November 1936, Pages 198–203, https://doi.org/10.2307/1882508 Published: 01 November 1936

Journal Article The Theory of Railway Rates Once More Get access F. W. Taussig F. W. Taussig Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 47, Issue 2, February 1933, Pages 337–342, https://doi.org/10.2307/1883691 Published: 01 February 1933

Journal Article On a Passage of Professor Taussig's International Trade Get access Achille Loria, Achille Loria Turin, Italy Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar F. W. Taussig F. W. Taussig Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 46, Issue 1, November 1931, Pages 187–189, https://doi.org/10.2307/1883926 Published: 01 November 1931

The final settlement; commanding position of the Conference Committee. — Higher duties on agricultural commodities, such as sugar, wheat, cotton, 3. — Hides, wool, meat, and dairy products, 7. — Minor agricultural products, 9. — Manufactured articles, cottons, woolens, silks, 13 — The general trend, 16. — The Tariff Commission retained, with no marked changes in its powers, 19.

I. The principle of equalizing costs professes to extend no favors, 175; in actual legislation, there is a scramble for favors, 177.—II. The Tariff Commission was established in 1916 as a body for inquiry and report, 178.—The great changes, in the flexible provisions of 1922, 179.—III. The Session of 1929–30, 180.—The make-up and procedure of the House and Senate Committees, 181.—The revolt of the insurgents, 184.—IV. The principle of merely equalizing costs ignored; aid to depressed industries (such as sugar) the dominant note, 186.—The farmers' representatives press for aid in other ways than by increased tariff rates, 189.—V. The Tariff Commission again; its unsatisfactory working after 1922, 191.—VI. Possibilities of the future, 194.—Tariff Boards in other English-speaking countries; the combination of power and responsibility in a Minister, 196.—Nothing of the kind in the United States, 197. — The President's position, 198.—Possibilities suggested by the methods elsewhere; Cabinet members and Congress, 199.—VII. No far-reaching changes to be expected, 200.—Maintenance and improvement of the present system the only practicable policy, 201.

Journal Article Alfred Marshall Get access F. W. Taussig F. W. Taussig Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 39, Issue 1, November 1924, Pages 1–14, https://doi.org/10.2307/1883951 Published: 01 November 1924

The comparison is of labor costs in the sense of quantity of labor per unit of output. — I. Coal in the United States and other countries, 98. — II. The United States and Great Britain: iron and steel; other articles, 102. — III. Window-glass in the United States, Belgium, and Sweden, 107. — IV. Cotton goods in the United States and Japan, 111.

Journal Article A Contribution to the Study of Cost Curves Get access F. W. Taussig F. W. Taussig Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 38, Issue 1, November 1923, Pages 173–176, https://doi.org/10.2307/1885776 Published: 01 November 1923

The tariff act of 1913 inconclusive as an experiment, 2. — Two factors important in 1922: war feeling, and demand for protection from the agricultural states, 3. — History of legislation, 6. — Concessions to the agricultural element, in duties and in the free list, 7. — Wool and sugar, 9. — Some extraordinarily high duties on manufactures, 11. — Dyestuffs, 14. — Administrative provisions and American valuation, 17. — The President's discretionary powers, 19. — How serviceable did the Tariff Commission prove? 22. — General administrative provisions, 24. — Conclusion, 26.

The current doctrine stated, 394. — In fact, demand often does not respond to price in the way assumed, 396. — The penumbra of indeterminate prices, 397. — Cases of fixed seasonal supply, 398. — Supplies that can be carried over, 400. — The demand curve not always negatively inclined, 402. — Speculation does not necessarily stabilize prices, 403. — Commodities produced continuously, 403. — Stock exchange dealings, 405. — The traditional grounds for justifying speculation not applicable to stock exchange dealings, 407. — Application of the present reasoning to dumping, 409. — To war prices, 410. — Conclusion, 410.