To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.
9 results
The Qualitative Content of Maximizing Models
Chamberlin Versus Chicago
Journal Article Chamberlin versus Chicago Get access G. C. Archibald G. C. Archibald London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 29, Issue 1, October 1961, Pages 2–28, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296178 Published: 01 October 1961
Testing Marginal Productivity Theory
Journal Article Testing Marginal Productivity Theory Get access G. C. Archibald G. C. Archibald London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 27, Issue 3, June 1960, Pages 210–213, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296084 Published: 01 June 1960
Utility, Risk, and Linearity
The "New" Theory of Consumer Demand and Monopolistic Competition
I. Introduction, 569. — II. Definition of the group, 570. — III. Demand conditions — the two-characteristics case, 573. — IV. The case of three characteristics, 576. — V. Four or more characteristics. 581. — VI. Cost conditions, 584. — VII. Entry and equilibrium, 586. — VIII. Further implications, 587. — IX. Conclusion, 589.
Monetary and Value Theory: Further Comment
Journal Article A Symposium on Monetary Theory: Monetary and Value Theory: Further Comment Get access G. C. Archibald, G. C. Archibald London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar R. C. Lipsey R. C. Lipsey London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 28, Issue 1, October 1960, Pages 50–56, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296250 Published: 01 October 1960
On the Theory of Foreign Exchange Reserve Requirements
G. C. Archibald, J. Richmond; On the Theory of Foreign Exchange Reserve Requirements12, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 38, Issue 2, 1 April 1971, P
Monetary and Value Theory: A Critique of Lange and Patinkin
G. C. Archibald, R. G. Lipsey; Monetary and Value Theory: A Critique of Lange and Patinkin1, The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 26, Issue 1, 1 October