This paper tests Mincer's minimum-wage model by estimating reduced-form wage and employment equations for both the covered and uncovered sectors in nine regions of the United States. As theory predicts, in regions with comparatively small covered-sector demand elasticities, the northern and midwestern regions, the uncovered-sector wage increases after a minimum-wage hike; and in regions with comparatively large demand elasticities, the southern and western regions, the uncovered-sector wage decreases. Because of data limitations the uncovered-sector employment effect could not be estimated sharply, and so its relationship to the covered-sector demand elasticity is weak.

This paper tests Mincer's minimum-wage model by estimating reduced-form wage and employment equations for both the covered and uncovered sectors in nine regions of the United States. As theory predicts, in regions with comparatively small covered-sector demand elasticities, the northern and midwestern regions, the uncovered-sector wage increases after a minimum-wage hike; and in regions with comparatively large demand elasticities, the southern and western regions, the uncovered-sector wage decreases. Because of data limitations the uncovered-sector employment effect could not be estimated sharply, and so its relationship to the covered-sector demand elasticity is weak.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Econometric Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Econometrica.