[Previous market-based research has generally failed to detect significantly negative market price reaction to the issuance of SFAS No. 8. Using standardized abnormal returns, this study re-examines the issue. Reaction to events culminating in the issuance of SFAS No. 52 is also studied. Finally, since the accounting method used prior to SFAS No. 8 may be related to the costs imposed by SFAS No. 8, the method is determined and its effect on the observed market reactions is investigated. Our results indicate an overall negative reaction to SFAS No. 8, with a positive reaction to SFAS No. 52. In addition, the pre-SFAS No. 8 method of accounting for foreign currency translation is found to be related to the market reactions to SFAS No. 8 and SFAS No. 52 in mixed and unpredictable ways.]

ABSTRACT Financial classification issues, and particularly the financial distress problem, continue to be subject to vigorous investigation. The corporate credit granting process has not received as much attention in the literature. This paper examines the relative effectiveness of parametric, nonparametric and judgemental classification procedures on a sample of corporate credit data. The judgemental model is based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Evidence indicates that (nonparametric) recursive partitioning methods provide greater information than simultaneous partitioning procedures. The judgemental model is found to perform as well as statistical models. A complementary relationship is proposed between the statistical and the judgemental models as an effective paradigm for granting credit.

ABSTRACT: Previous market-based research has generally failed to detect significantly negative market price reaction to the issuance of SFAS No. 8. Using standardized abnormal returns, this study re-examines the issue. Reaction to events culminating in the issuance of SFAS No. 52 is also studied. Finally, since the accounting method used prior to SFAS No. 8 may be related to the costs imposed by SFAS No. 8, the method is determined and its effect on the observed market reactions is investigated. Our results indicate an overall negative reaction to SFAS No. 8, with a positive reaction to SFAS No. 52. In addition, the pre-SFAS No. 8 method of accounting for foreign currency translation is found to be related to the market reactions to SFAS No. 8 and SFAS No. 52 in mixed and unpredictable ways.