We investigate the simultaneous relationship among bank capital, risk and profitability, but also considering bank ownership and the emergence of Pan-African cross-border banks. We specify a simultaneous equation model and estimate it using hand-collected bank level data from all West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) countries for 2000–2014. We split the countries into lower middle-income (LMICs) and low-income (LICs) according to the World Bank classification. We uncover evidence that the sensitivity of bank profitability to an increase in capital ratio seems to be somewhat higher in LMICs (+0.10) than in LICs (+0.05). Moreover, we find that bank capital positions tend to comove positively with the business cycle in LICs, mimicking a key postulate of Basel III. After differentiating between cross-border Pan-African banks and foreign banks from outside the continent, we find that the overall effect of bank ownership on risk depends on the origin of banks (French versus Pan-African). These findings are robust to alternative estimation techniques and the use of competing measures of risk and profitability.

Using quarterly financial statements and stock market data from 1982 to 2010 for the six largest Canadian chartered banks, this paper documents positive co-movement between Canadian banks’ capital buffer and business cycles. The adoption of Basel Accords and the balance sheet leverage cap imposed by Canadian banking regulations did not change this cyclical behavior of Canadian bank capital. We find Canadian banks to be well-capitalized and that they hold a larger capital buffer in expansion than in recession, which may explain how they weathered the recent subprime financial crisis so well. This evidence that Canadian banks ride the business and regulatory periods underscores the appropriateness of a both micro- and a macro-prudential “through-the-cycle” approach to capital adequacy as advocated in the proposed Basel III framework to strengthen the resilience of the banking sector.