To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
3 results

When Does the Internal Audit Function Enhance Audit Committee Effectiveness?

The Accounting Review 2023 98(2), 329-359 open access
I examine whether audit committees (ACs) improve financial reporting reliability by utilizing an internal audit function (IAF) as a resource and use semistructured interviews with chief audit executives and AC chairs to develop an understanding of the nature of AC-IAF relations. Using AC charters, I measure AC interaction with IAFs, finding improvement in financial reporting reliability for firms that introduce a new IAF under a New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) mandate. This improvement is limited to firms with significant interaction between ACs and new IAFs. Using detailed hand-coded data, I investigate the different kinds of interactions between ACs and IAFs, finding evidence of the importance of private meetings to review the IAF's scope, findings, and recommendations. The value of the IAF as a resource to the AC is greater when the AC ensures free and open communication, promotes IAF independence, and stands in greater ex ante need of monitoring assistance.

Does Restricting Managers' Discretion through GAAP Impact the Usefulness of Accounting Information in Debt Contracting?†

Contemporary Accounting Research 2022 39(2), 826-862
We examine whether restricting managers' discretion through GAAP impacts the usefulness of accounting information in debt contracting. Our study informs standard setters and regulators regarding the debt contracting implications of limiting managers' discretion via accounting standards. We predict and find that under more restrictive standards, lenders make more non‐GAAP modifications to GAAP‐based performance measures, suggesting that restrictions of managers' discretion reduce the usefulness of accounting information. We perform two additional analyses to enhance identification. First, in line‐item‐level analysis, we document a positive relation between the exclusion of specific nonrecurring items from contractual definitions of earnings and the number of restrictions in the GAAP standards that apply to each specific item each year. Second, using difference‐in‐differences tests around standard changes, we find that the propensity to exclude items varies positively with changes in the restrictiveness of related standards. Moreover, we predict and find that restrictive standards are also positively associated with loan spreads but significantly less so when lenders adjust GAAP numbers in loan contracts. Overall, this study improves our understanding of how attributes of accounting standards impact the usefulness of accounting information.

Loan Contracting and Changes to the Accounting for Leases: Implications of Accounting Standards Codification 842

Contemporary Accounting Research 2026 43(2), 1091-1118
This study investigates the adoption and implications of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842 lease accounting standards in private loan contracts. Analyzing a comprehensive sample of material loan contracts from 2011 to 2023, we document a pervasive reluctance to adopt ASC 842. Specifically, we find that for loans issued prior to, but maturing after, the standard effective date, only 41% of loans adopt the standard. For loans issued after the standard effective date, only 46% of loans adopt the standard. Our determinants analyses reveal that for loans issued prior to the effective date, the reluctance to adopt ASC 842 is associated with (1) a preference for using consistent lease classifications over time, (2) concerns about borrower opportunism, and (3) the costs of negotiating or renegotiating lease‐related loan terms within lending syndicates. In contrast, for loans issued after the effective date, only negotiation costs are associated with the reluctance to adopt. Our findings suggest that the costs of adopting ASC 842 in private loan contracts often outweigh the benefits and that contracting parties prefer a stable accounting standard environment.