Bad Debt "Expense": Not a Member of the Class of Data for Measuring Operating Income: A Reply.
Abstract The article argues that bad debt expense does not meet the sufficient and necessary condition for membership in the class of data for measuring operating income for a firm. The main attribute of homogeneity is specified in the initial paper as an exchange (economic) transaction characterized by a reciprocal flow of consideration between the entity and another party which may assume the form of a group. Items such as taxes, financing costs, and revenues emerging from financial transactions in the case of the industrial entity, and certain extraordinary transactions likewise do not meet the prevailing tests or necessary character for inclusion in the class of data deemed relevant for measuring operating income from normal and recurring operations. The two forms of the financing arrangement should not be permitted to affect the primary revenue accounts or periodic operating income for the entity. Stated another way, the amount of operating revenue is the same irrespective of whether the entity receives cash immediately or a promise from the customer to transfer cash in the future. Finally, it is an observable fact that extant accounting treatment of bad debt "expense" includes it as an element in the measurement of operating income. Economic outputs, expressed in terms of a standard unit of money value, are not matched with financial balances (trade receivables) to measure income.