To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
17 results

Further Comments

Review of Economic Studies 1958 25(3), 200
Journal Article Further Comments Get access Lionel McKenzie Lionel McKenzie Rochester, N. Y. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 25, Issue 3, June 1958, Page 200, https://doi.org/10.2307/2295989 Published: 01 June 1958

Demand Theory Without a Utility Index

Review of Economic Studies 1957 24(3), 185
Journal Article Demand Theory Without a Utility Index Get access Lionel McKenzie Lionel McKenzie Durham, North Carolina Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 24, Issue 3, June 1957, Pages 185–189, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296067 Published: 01 June 1957

The Turnpike Theorem of Morishima

Review of Economic Studies 1963 30(3), 169
The Turnpike Theorem of Morishima Get access Lionel W. McKenzie Lionel W. McKenzie Rochester Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 30, Issue 3, October 1963, Pages 169–176, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296317 Published: 01 October 1963

Specialization in Production and the Production Possibility Locus

Review of Economic Studies 1955 23(1), 56
Journal Article Specialization in Production and the Production Possibility Locus Get access Lionel W. McKenzie Lionel W. McKenzie Durham, North Carolina Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 23, Issue 1, 1955, Pages 56–64, https://doi.org/10.2307/2296152 Published: 01 April 1955

Specialisation and Efficiency in World Production

Review of Economic Studies 1953 21(3), 165
Journal Article Specialisation and Efficiency in World Production Get access Lionel W. McKenzie Lionel W. McKenzie Durham, North Carolina Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 21, Issue 3, 1953, Pages 165–180, https://doi.org/10.2307/2295770 Published: 01 January 1953

The Classical Theorem on Existence of Competitive Equilibrium

Econometrica 1981 49(4), 819 open access
This paper presents the classical theorem on the existence of equilibrium as it was proved in the 1950's with the various improvements that have been made since then.In particular, the elimination of the survival assumption and of the requirement of transitive preferences are carried through with a proof that uses a mapping of social demand.This approach favors intuitive understanding and generalization of the results.Finally, the role of the firm and the introduction of external economies are critically viewed. MYPURPOSE IS TO DISCUSS the present status of the classical theorem on existence of competitive equilibrium that was proved in various guises in the 1950's by Arrow and Debreu [1], Debreu [5, 6], Gale [8], Kuhn [14], McKenzie [17, 18, 19], and Nikaido [22].The earliest papers were those of Arrow and Debreu, and McKenzie, both of which were presented to the Econometric Society at its Chicago meeting in December, 1952.They were written independently.The paper of Nikaido was also written independently of the other papers but delayed in publication.The major predecessors of the papers of the fifties were the papers of Abraham Wald [31, 32] and John von Neumann [30], all of which were delivered to Karl Menger's Colloquium in Vienna during the 1930's.The paper of von Neumann was not concerned with competitive equilibrium in the classical sense but with a program of maximal balanced growth in a closed production model.However, he first used a fixed point theorem for an existence argument in economics and provided the generalization of the Brouwer theorem that was the major mathematical tool in the classical proofs.Wald achieved the first success with the general problem of the existence of a meaningful solution to the Walrasian system of equations.The proofs which were published used an assumption that later became known as the Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference.This axiom virtually reduces the set of consumers to one person, since it is equivalent to consistent choices under budget constraints.In a one consumer economy the existence of the equilibrium becomes a simple maximum problem and advanced methods are not needed.When many consumers with independent preference orders are present, it has been shown (Uzawa [29]) that fixed point methods are necessary.Wald also wrote a third paper whose main theorem was announced in a summary article [33], but which never reached

Turnpike Theory

Econometrica 1976 44(5), 841
[Support prices are derived for weakly maximal paths in an optimal growth model which is time dependent but without uncertainty. The notion of "reachable" stocks and paths is defined and used to derive turnpike theorems by the value loss method. The proofs do not depend on the presence of optimal balanced paths nor on the usual transversality conditions. The theorems are extended to the classical model which has a non-trivial von Neumann facet.]