[Experienced auditors tend to structure their knowledge of financial statement errors with audit objective as the primary organizing dimension and transaction cycle as secondary. Yet, many audit tasks are structured in the opposite manner, requiring auditors to assess whether objectives are met for each transaction cycle. Our paper reports the results of an experiment which indicates that this mismatch between knowledge structure and task structure may hinder auditors' ability to draw on previous experiences when making conditional probability judgments and when allocating audit hours to various objectives within cycles. These results suggest one instance where knowledge structures that are often functional may have adverse effects when they do not match the task structure to which they are applied.]

[This paper investigates whether replacing a standard that employs a vague, verbal disclosure threshold with a standard that employs a more stringent, numerical threshold mitigates the aggressiveness of reporting decisions. Two experiments were performed in a tax setting. The results indicate that (1) when a verbal standard is in place, tax practitioners use the latitude inherent in a verbal standard to support aggressive reporting decisions, and (2) when a numerical standard is in place, tax practitioners use instead the latitude available in assessing evidential support to justify an aggressive reporting decision. This shift in incentive effect is pronounced enough to render reporting decisions made under the numerical standard as aggressive as reporting decisions made under the verbal standard. These results indicate that replacing verbal thresholds with numerical thresholds may not diminish the aggressiveness of reporting decisions.]

Abstract. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5 requires accrual of contingent losses which are deemed probable. This disclosure criterion is intended to be applied uniformly across a variety of contexts. We performed an experiment which examined whether audit managers' interpretations of the SFAS No. 5 probability expressions are influenced by one contextual feature, event base rate. Counter to the intention of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), interpretations of the expression probable were positively associated with event base rate. Résumé. Le SFAS n o 5 exige l'imputation à l'exercice des pertes éventuelles qui sont jugées «probables». La règle ainsi établie veut que ce critère de présentation d'information soit appliqué uniformément dans des contextes très divers. Les auteurs procèdent à une expérience dans le cadre de laquelle ils examinent si la façon dont les responsables de mission interprètent la gamme de probabilités, au sens du SFAS n o 5, est influencée par une caractéristique contextuelle, la fréquence relative de l'événement. Contrairement au résultat visé par le FASB, les interprétations du terme «probable» sont en relation positive avec la fréquence relative de l'événement.

Abstract Investigates whether replacing a standard that employs a vague, verbal disclosure threshold with a standard that employs a more stringent numerical threshold mitigates the aggressiveness of reporting decisions in accounting. Performance in a tax setting; Effect of incentives on the interpretation of vague standards.

Abstract Presents the results of an experiment which focuses on the mismatch between auditors' tendency to structure their knowledge of financial statement errors with audit objective. Audit tasks' requirement of auditors' assessment of objectives; Effects of knowledge structures' mismatch with task structures.