The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), in their joint Financial Statement Presentation project, are reconsidering the basic format of financial statements. The Boards’ preliminary discussions related to this joint project indicate that they intend to modify the required financial statements to increase the proximity of performance‐related information for each reported period. We provide evidence related to this potential change by investigating the effects of financial statement information proximity on investors’ ability to learn the forecast‐relevant time series properties of reported cash flows and accruals. We also examine the role feedback plays in this relationship. Our experimental results suggest that nonprofessional investors are able to more quickly learn the relation between current period cash flows and accruals and future cash flow realizations when financial statement information is presented in a single statement rather than separated into two statements. In addition, we find that nonprofessional investors exhibit lower levels of absolute forecast errors and less forecast dispersion when financial statement information is unified into a single statement. Finally, we provide evidence that nonprofessional investors who receive extensive outcome feedback on a single page initially learn more quickly and later, after learning has leveled off, accurately forecast more consistently than do investors who receive extensive or limited feedback spread across two pages. Overall, our results provide evidence on the effectiveness of alternate financial statement presentation formats and the potential usefulness of receiving more extensive feedback.
D. Eric Hirst, Patrick E. Hopkins, Comprehensive Income Reporting and Analysts' Valuation Judgments, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 36, Studies on Enhancing the Financial Reporting Model (1998), pp. 47-75
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
We provide evidence that analysts' stock-price judgments depend on (1) the method of accounting for a business combination and (2) the number of years that have elapsed since the business combination. Consistent with business-press reports of managers' concerns, analysts' stock-price judgments are lowest when a company applies the purchase method of accounting and ratably amortizes the acquisition premium. The number of years since the business combination affects analysts' price estimates only when the company applies the purchase method and ratably amortizes goodwill—analysts' price estimates are lower when the business-combination transaction is further in the past. However, this joint effect of accounting method and timing is mitigated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board's proposed income-statement format requiring companies to report separate line items for after-tax income before goodwill charges and net-of-tax goodwill charges. When a company uses the purchase method of accounting and writes off the acquisition premium as in-process research and development, analysts' stockprice judgments are not statistically different from their judgments when a company applies pooling-of-interest accounting.
The majority of U.S. public companies release annual earnings prior to the completion of audit fieldwork. We investigate this phenomenon in a controlled experiment with audit partners and senior managers. We find that releasing earnings before completion of the audit pressures auditors to adopt the goals of management, thereby reducing the likelihood of post‐announcement audit‐adjustment recommendations. We also examine the effect of audit committee (AC) strength in improving auditors’ judgments after annual earnings are released. When ACs are actively involved in accounting issues and proactively communicating with auditors—characteristics currently lacking in most ACs—the negative effects on auditors’ judgments are completely mitigated. Our study provides evidence on potential unintended consequences of early release of earnings and the importance of investing in high‐quality ACs to mitigate adverse effects of client pressures on audit judgment and financial reporting quality.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), in their joint Financial Statement Presentation project, are reconsidering the basic format of financial statements. The Boards’ preliminary discussions related to this joint project indicate that they intend to modify the required financial statements to increase the proximity of performance‐related information for each reported period. We provide evidence related to this potential change by investigating the effects of financial statement information proximity on investors’ ability to learn the forecast‐relevant time series properties of reported cash flows and accruals. We also examine the role feedback plays in this relationship. Our experimental results suggest that nonprofessional investors are able to more quickly learn the relation between current period cash flows and accruals and future cash flow realizations when financial statement information is presented in a single statement rather than separated into two statements. In addition, we find that nonprofessional investors exhibit lower levels of absolute forecast errors and less forecast dispersion when financial statement information is unified into a single statement. Finally, we provide evidence that nonprofessional investors who receive extensive outcome feedback on a single page initially learn more quickly and later, after learning has leveled off, accurately forecast more consistently than do investors who receive extensive or limited feedback spread across two pages. Overall, our results provide evidence on the effectiveness of alternate financial statement presentation formats and the potential usefulness of receiving more extensive feedback.
Le Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) et l’International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), dans leur projet conjoint de norme relative à la présentation des états financiers, remettent à l’étude les éléments de base de la présentation des états financiers. Les discussions préliminaires des deux organismes dans le cadre de ce projet indiquent qu’ils entendent modifier les états financiers exigés de manière à accroître la proximité de l’information liée à la performance relative à chaque période. Les auteurs apportent des preuves en ce qui a trait à ce changement potentiel en analysant l’incidence de la proximité de l’information contenue dans les états financiers sur la capacité des investisseurs d’assimiler les propriétés sérielles des données relatives aux flux de trésorerie et aux régularisations qui sont présentées, pertinentes à la formulation de prévisions. Ils examinent également le rôle que joue l’information rétroactive dans cette relation. Les résultats expérimentaux de l’étude semblent indiquer que les investisseurs non professionnels sont en mesure d’assimiler plus rapidement la relation entre les flux de trésorerie et les régularisations de la période courante et la matérialisation des flux de trésorerie futurs lorsque l’information contenue dans les états financiers est présentée dans un seul état plutôt que lorsqu’elle est subdivisée en deux états. Les auteurs constatent en outre que les investisseurs non professionnels affichent des degrés plus faibles d’erreurs prévisionnelles absolues et une dispersion des prévisions moins grande lorsque l’information contenue dans les états financiers leur est communiquée dans un seul état. Enfin, les auteurs démontrent que les investisseurs non professionnels à qui sont communiquées sur une seule page des observations rétroactives exhaustives quant aux résultats assimilent plus rapidement l’information au départ et, une fois l’apprentissage intégré, formulent des prévisions exactes avec plus de régularité que les investisseurs à qui sont communiquées en deux pages des observations rétroactives, exhaustives ou limitées. Dans l’ensemble, les résultats de l’étude tendent à démontrer l’efficacité des solutions de rechange quant à la présentation des états financiers et l’utilité potentielle de la communication d’observations rétroactives plus exhaustives.