This paper investigates factors associated with audit firm positions on Auditing Standards Board issues during the three-year period ending during 1984. The major finding is that firms with relatively structured audit technologies tend to favor proposed statements while firms with relatively unstructured technologies do not. Audit firm size is not associated with firm position. Also, Big 8 firms favoring proposed statements have lower staff-to-partner ratios and concentrate less in auditing. The staff-to-partner ratio is negatively associated with technology. The results' implications for auditing profession organization studies and auditing and financial reporting research are investigated.

This paper describes changes in hours of work and income between 1959 and 1979 of women and men ages 25-64. It includes attempts to measure and value nonmarket production and leisure as well as market work, to take account of possible income sharing within households, and to allow for economies of scale in household production. The most important empirical result is that, relative to men, women's access to goods and services and leisure was lower in 1979 than in 1959. Changes in hourly earnings, hours of work, and household structure contributed to this result. The sex differential in hourly earnings is explored in detail.

Résumé. La profession comptable et de vérification fait grand usage de mots pour communiquer les niveaux d'incertitude dans des situations formelles et informelles s'étendant des déclarations du Manuel, en passant par les documents de travail jusqu'aux communications de tous les jours. La littérature comptable ne présente pas de recherches sur le niveau d'ambiguïté dans les interprétations de telles communications ou sur les facteurs qui pourraient potentiellement influencer cette ambiguïté. Cet article fournit un examen détaillé et approfondi de l'ambiguïté des interprétations dans la communication de l'incertitude en faisant usage d'un vocabulaire familier aux comptables et aux vérificateurs. Des niveaux de probabilité moyens furent calculés à partir des réponses à différents mots communément utilisés. Des analyses supplémentaires des interprétations furent entreprises pour comparer différentes méthodes de répondre aux communications. Pour ce faire, nous avons utilisé différentes façons pour évaluer l'impact sur les interprétations et pour comparer les réponses des sujets de différents groupes. Nous avons fait usage de différents designs expérimentaux afin d'assurer la validité interne nécessaire à l'interprétation des résultats de la recherche. La validité externe fut assurée par l'utilisation: de mots communs, de sujets raisonnablement sophistiqués, d'observations à différents moments et en faisant des comparaisons avec les résultats d'expériences dans d'autres cadres. Cet article démontre que l'ambiguïté existe et que cette ambiguïté est raisonnablement stable pour le vocabulaire du comptable. De même, l'ambiguïté peut être augmentée par l'utilisation de modes de réponse difficiles de la part de l'interprète, mais elle ne peut être réduite facilement.

The accounting and auditing profession makes extensive use of words to communicate levels of uncertainty in both formal and informal situations ranging from Handbook pronouncements to working papers to everyday communications. Yet the accounting literature does not present research on the level of ambiguity in interpretations of such communications or the factors that could potentially influence this ambiguity. This paper provides an extensive and detailed examination of the ambiguity of interpretations in the communication of uncertainty using a vocabulary familiar to accountants and auditors. Average probability levels were computed from responses to various commonly used words. Further analyses of interpretations were undertaken by comparing different methods of responding to the communications, using a variety of ways of assessing the impact on interpretations and comparing the responses of various subject groups. The studies used various experimental designs in order to provide the internal validity necessary to interpret research results. The external validity was obtained by using common words, reasonably sophisticated subjects, observations at various times and by comparing with the results of experiments in other settings. This paper demonstrates that ambiguity exists and that this ambiguity is reasonably stable for the vocabulary of the accountant. Also ambiguity can be increased by the use of difficult response modes by the interpreter but it cannot easily be reduced.

"This paper uses combinations of full brothers, half brothers, and fathers and sons to measure the effect of common family background on a household's income and wealth. While the data are drawn from a nineteenth-century [U.S.] population, the intraclass correlation for income ranges from .13 to .18, which is similar to that found in modern samples. Intraclass correlations for wealth are significantly higher (.18-.35) than are those for income. Intraclass correlations of half brothers compared to those for full brothers suggest that fathers play a dominant role in the transmission of the common family effect. When unobserved background is decomposed into individual and family effects, the individual effect dominates the family effect for income, while the family effect dominates the individual effect for wealth." A comment by Sherwin Rosen is included (pp. 80-2).

This paper uses industry price-cost margin data to estimate the extent to which unions reduce profits. Estimates allowing for the endogeneity of union status are contrasted with estimates that assume union status is exogenous and not determined in part by either profitability or industry structure. Endogeneity is found to be an important consideration in estimating the union impact on profits: two-stage estimates are considerably larger than OLS estimates. The final section explores the total estimated redistribution from capital to labor in the manufacturing sector. An important conclusion is that unions raise prices less than was previously believed.

This paper examines whether investors with power utility functions choose mean-variance-(MV) efficient portfolios when returns are approximately normally distributed and there is borrowing or lending at a riskless interest rate. The results show that the unlevered portfolios of power utility investors plot very closely to the MV-efficient frontier. However, there are marked differences in the mix of risky assets, regardless of whether the portfolios are highly concentrated or widely diversified. Such differences allow power investors to remain solvent even when they lever their optimal portfolios to a greater extent than “less risk-averse” MV investors who risk bankruptcy. It is concluded that the investment policies of power utility and MV investors with similar risk aversion measures are not as similar as is commonly believed. This is particularly true for high power investors, unless explicit solvency constraints are imposed on the MV problem, and for low power investors when quadratic utility approximations are made to the power utility functions. These differences in the investment policies of power utility and MV investors lead us to question the widely-accepted assertion that the assumptions of homogeneous beliefs, normality, a riskless asset, and risk-averse investors imply the simple MV CAPM where all investors, including power utility investors, hold combinations of the market portfolio and the riskless asset.

"Monte Carlo experimentation in econometrics helps ‘solve’ deterministic problems by simulating stochastic analogues in which the analytical unknowns are reformulated as parameters to be estimated." (Hendry (1980)) With that in mind, Monte Carlo studies may be divided operationally into three phases: design, simulation, and post-simulation analysis. This paper provides a guide to the last of those three, post-simulation analysis, given the design and simulation of a Monte Carlo study, and uses Pesaran's (1974) study of statistics for testing non-nested hypotheses to illustrate the techniques described. A statistic is derived for testing for significant deviations between the asymptotic and (observed) finite sample properties. Further, that statistic provides the basis for analysing discrepancies between the finite sample and asymptotic properties using response surfaces. The results for Pesaran's study indicate the value of asymptotic theory in interpreting finite sample properties and certain limitations for doing so. Finally, a method is proposed for adjusting the finite sample sizes of different test statistics so that comparisons of their power may be made. Extensions to other finite sample properties are indicated.