To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
5 results ✕ Clear filters

Efficient Estimation of Simultaneous Equations with Auto-Regressive Errors by Instrumental Variables

The Review of Economics and Statistics 1972 54(4), 444
T HE purpose of this paper is to point out how the efficient instrumental-variables technique discussed by Brundy and Jorgenson (1971) can be modified to take into account auto-regressive properties of the error terms. The limited-information and full-information estimators proposed in this paper are consistent and have the same asymptotic distributions as the limited-information and full-information maximum likelihood estimators, respectively. The full-information estimation of simultaneous equations models with auto-regressive errors has been discussed by Sargan (1961), Hendry (1971), Chow and Fair (1973), and Dhrymes (1971). Sargan originally proposed the full-information maximum likelihood estimation of such models, and Hendry and Chow and Fair have recently developed computationally feasible methods for obtaining the maximum likelihood estimates. Hendry considered only the case of completely unrestricted auto-regressive coefficient matrices (i.e., no zero elements), whereas Chow and Fair considered the case of restricted auto-regressive coefficient matrices as well. Dhrymes has recently proposed the three-stage least squares estimator of simultaneous equations models with auto-regressive errors. Dhrymes also considered only the case of completely unrestricted auto-regressive coefficient matrices. The limited-information estimation of simultaneous equations models with auto-regressive errors has been discussed by Sargan (1961), Amemiya (1966), and Fair (1970), among others. Sargan proposed the limited-information maximum likelihood estimation of such models, and Amemiya and Fair considered various two-stage least souares estimators of such models. Most of the work on limited-information estimators has been concerned with the case of diagonal auto-regressive coefficient matrices. Brundy and Jorgenson's criticism of the twoand three-stage least squares estimators, namely, that the first stage involves estimating reduced form equations with a very large number of variables included in them, holds even more so for models with auto-regressive errors. For these models, the reduced form equations include not only all of the predetermined variables in the system but also all of the lagged endogenous and lagged predetermined variables. In fact, one of the main purposes of the work by Fair (1970) was to suggest ways in which the number of variables used in the first stage regressions of two-stage least squares might be decreased with perhaps small loss of asymptotic efficiency. The advantage of the instrumental-variables techniques proposed in the Brundy-Jorgenson paper and in this paper is that the first stage regressions need not be run.

DISEQUILIBRIUM IN HOUSING MODELS

Journal of Finance 1972 27(2), 207-221
The housing and mortgage markets have long been considered to be markets that may not always be in equilibrium, and many econometric models of the housing and mortgage markets have tried in one way or another to account for disequilibrium effects. In this paper a critique of previous models of the housing

Methods of Estimation for Markets in Disequilibrium

Econometrica 1972 40(3), 497
[This paper is concerned with the econometric problems associated with estimating supply and demand schedules in disequilibrium markets. The general problem is that in the absence of an equilibrium condition the ex ante demand and supply quantities cannot in general be equated to the observed quatity traded in the market. Four methods of estimation, differing primarily in their use of information on price-setting behavior, are developed in this paper. The first method is a generalization of an earlier meothd developed by R. Quandt and is based upon the maximization of a likelihood function. The method does not require any specific assumption about price-setting behavior, and it allows the sample separation (into demand and supply regimes) to be estimated along with the coefficient estimates. The second and third methods use the change in price as a qualitative proxy in determining the sample separation. The fouth method uses the change in price as a quantitative proxy for the amount of excess demand (supply) in the market. In the final section of the paper the four methods are used to estimate a a model of the housing and mortgage market in an effort to gauge the potential usefulness of each of the methods.]