We analyze how countercyclical liquidity policy—via reserve requirements (RRs)—affects the credit cycle. For identification, we exploit supervisory credit register data and RR changes in Brazil made for monetary and macroprudential purposes and affecting banks differently. We find that countercyclical liquidity policy smooths credit supply cycles at the loan and firm levels. The effects of easing during crises are three times stronger than are those of tightening during booms, particularly for low-risk firms. We also explore interest rate policy. Credit supply effects are stronger among high-risk firms and during tightening, when interest rates are more effective than RRs.

ABSTRACT We show that FX interventions can be effective, particularly in attenuating global financial spillovers. We exploit global financial shocks and Brazilian central bank interventions in FX derivatives using three matched administrative registers: bank credit (to firms), foreign credit to banks, and employer‐employees. After the U.S. Taper Tantrum (followed by emerging markets' FX turbulence), Brazilian banks with more foreign debt cut credit supply, reducing firm‐level employment. A subsequent large policy intervention supplying derivatives against FX risks — hedger of last resort — halved the negative effects. A 2008 to 2015 panel exploiting global FX shocks and local FX interventions confirms the results and the hedging channel. However, the FX policy entails fiscal and moral hazard costs.