This paper tests Jensen's (1986a) free cash flow theory that managers overinvest retained earnings by undertaking negative-NPV projects. The test is based on the theory's implication that earnings response coefficients depend positively on payout ratios. It is supported by the data for a sample of 112 firms over the 1951–1986 period. Another test finds that the returns on retained earnings are lower than proxies for the market's required rate of return, as implied by the free cash flow theory. However, the sample firms' Jensen alphas are reliably positive, suggesting that caution is warranted in interpreting the results.

The economic theory of auditor independence (DeAngelo 1981b) suggests that auditors' incentives to compromise their independence are related to client importance. Using ratios of client fees and of nonaudit fees divided by the audit firm's U.S. revenues or a surrogate for the audit-practice-office revenues as measures of client importance, we investigate their association with Jones-model abnormal accruals. In a sample of 1,871 clients of Big 5 audit firms we do not find a statistically significant association between abnormal accruals and any of the client importance measures. Our theory development also suggests that auditor incentives to compromise independence should increase with the extent of client opportunities and incentives to manage earnings, and decrease with the strength of corporate governance and auditor expertise. We also do not find a statistically significant association between abnormal accruals and client importance in subsets of the samples partitioned by proxies for these factors.

After 1983, Medicare paid hospitals for inpatient services at fixed rates, but continued to reimburse outpatient services based on reported cost. Using data from Washington State we find that hospitals responded by increasing outpatient services to Medicare patients compared to non-Medicare patients-the ratio of Medicare outpatient revenues as a percentage of total Medicare revenues increased after 1983 to a significantly greater extent than for non-Medicare patients. We also find that allocations of overhead costs to outpatient departments increased after 1983. These findings suggest that hospitals change their patient mix and cost allocations to maximize hospital cash flows.

This study tests an implication of the real‐options theory of investment, that uncertainty leads firms to prefer technologies with low fixed and high variable costs. In 1983, a change in Medicare reimbursement increased the uncertainty of revenues for hospitals. Using a sample of 831 departments in 59 Washington State hospitals over the 1977–1994 period, we find that the ratio of variable to total costs increased after 1983. This increase is not attributable to a gradual increase in the ratio over time: We estimate a significant increase after 1983 even after controlling for a time trend. Further, we find a greater increase in the variable‐to‐total cost ratio for hospitals that had higher percentages of Medicare patients, increasing our confidence in the conclusion that the change in cost behavior is attributable to Medicare's change in reimbursement.

We examine the value relevance and reliability of brand assets recognized by 33 U.K. firms, and the stock price reaction to the announcement of brand capitalization. We find that brand assets are value relevant, i.e., associated with market values. However, the market capitalization rates of brands of firms with low contracting incentives are higher than those of firms with high contracting incentives to capitalize and overstate brand values. Thus, there could be substantial differences in the extent of bias or error in brand valuations of firms with different levels of contracting incentives, i.e., brand asset measures might not be reliable. The stock price reaction during the 21 days surrounding the first announcement of brand recognition is significantly positively associated with the recognized brand amount. However, the brand coefficient is only a small fraction of what would be expected if markets did not impute any value to brands before firms recognized them. Few previous value-relevance studies have examined intangible assets recognized in financial statements, and none have examined the effects of contracting incentives on the reliability of the reported values of intangible assets.

This study investigates coefficient bias and heteroscedasticity resulting from scale differences in accounting levels‐based research designs analytically and using simulations based on accounting data. Findings indicate that including a scale proxy as an independent variable is more effective than deflation at mitigating coefficient bias, even if the proxy is 95 percent correlated with the true scale factor. In fact, deflation can worsen coefficient bias. Also, deflation often does not noticeably reduce heteroscedasticity and can decrease estimation efficiency. White (1980) standard errors are close to the true ones in regressions using undeflated variables. Replications of specifications in three recent accounting studies confirm the simulation findings. The findings suggest that when scale differences are of concern, accounting researchers should include a scale proxy as an independent variable and report inferences based on White standard errors. Résumé. Les auteurs examinent, tant sur le plan analytique qu'au moyen de simulations basées sur les données comptables, la distorsion des coefficients et l'hétéroscédasticité résultant des différences d'échelle dans les plans de recherche comptable basés sur les niveaux. Leurs constatations révèlent que l'inclusion d'un substitut d'échelle à titre de variable indépendante est plus efficace que la déflation pour atténuer la distorsion relative au coefficient, même si le substitut présente une corrélation de 95 pour cent avec le véritable facteur d'échelle. En fait, la déflation peut accentuer la distorsion relative au coefficient. Aussi, il arrive souvent que la déflation, sans réduire de façon appréciable l'hétéroscédasticité, puisse diminuer l'efficience de l'estimation. Les erreurs‐types de White (1980) se rapprochent des erreurs véritables dans les régressions faisant appel à des variables non déflatées. La répétition des mêmes caractéristiques dans trois études comptables récentes confirme les résultats de la simulation. Les conclusions de l'étude donnent à penser que lorsque les différences d'échelle sont sujet de préoccupation, les chercheurs en comptabilité devraient faire intervenir un substitut d'échelle à titre de variable indépendante et formuler les inférences à partir des erreurs‐types de White.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) increases restrictions on private litigation for securities fraud. We examine stock price reactions on legislative-event-related days of firms in four high-litigation-risk industries. Two other studies on this issue, Spiess and Tkac (1997) (ST) and Johnson et al. (2000) (JKN), conclude that shareholders considered PSLRA beneficial. While we find largely similar daily abnormal returns for event-related days that they examine, we present evidence that the timing of multiple confounding events makes the interpretation of these daily returns ambiguous. Results from additional analyses beyond those conducted by ST and JKN (market price reversal tests, analysis of additional legislative-event-related days, cumulative abnormal returns over the legislative period, and analysis of other events affecting investors' ability to bring securities-related lawsuits), are largely inconsistent with their interpretation, suggesting instead that shareholders in the four high-litigation-risk industries react negatively on average to PSLRA's restrictions on their ability to bring securities-related lawsuits.

Ratings shopping is a well-documented cause for ratings inflation by credit rating agencies (CRAs). Its unobservability makes it difficult for market participants to undo it. In this paper, we exploit a unique regulation in India that requires CRAs to disclose ratings that were solicited but were eventually rejected by issuers. This regulation, which aims to enhance the transparency in the ratings process, allows us to empirically examine whether these disclosures influence ratings shopping and, consequently, ratings inflation. We find that the disclosure requirements result in an increase in the incidence of future downgrades and type 1 errors and a decrease in the occurrence of type 2 errors. These results are consistent with the view that the enhanced disclosure requirement did not reduce shopping and instead led to unintended consequences, such as an increase in implicit shopping, where issuers selectively engage lenient CRAs to obtain favorable ratings.