To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.
Fields:
16 results
Ships Passing in the Night: Highlighting Complementary Accounting Research Across Paradigms
The auditor’s strategy selection for negotiation with management: Flexibility of initial accounting position and nature of the relationship
Auditor–client management relationships and roles in negotiating financial reporting
The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures
The balanced scorecard is a new tool that complements traditional measures of business unit performance. The scorecard contains a diverse set of performance measures, including financial performance, customer relations, internal business processes, and learning and growth. Advocates of the balanced scorecard suggest that each unit in the organization should develop and use its own scorecard, choosing measures that capture the unit's business strategy. Our study examines judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard—specifically, how balanced scorecards that include some measures common to multiple units and other measures that are unique to a particular unit affect superiors' evaluations of that unit's performance. Our test shows that only the common measures affect the superiors' evaluations. We discuss the implications of this result for research and practice.
Honesty in Accounting and Control: A Discussion of “The Effect of Information Systems on Honesty in Managerial Reporting: A Behavioral Perspective”*
Be honest to those who are honest, and be honest to those who are not honest.
The Relationship between Board Characteristics and Voluntary Improvements in Audit Committee Composition and Experience*
This study empirically examines the relation between certain board of director characteristics and the extent that audit committee composition voluntarily exceeds minimum mandated levels and includes outside directors with financial reporting and audit committee knowledge and experience. This study focuses on board characteristics because the board directly controls audit committee membership. Such staffing decisions can directly affect the ability of the audit committee to monitor management's financial reporting process on behalf of the board. Results suggest that Canadian firms that voluntarily include more outside directors on the audit committee than the mandated minimum have larger boards with more outsiders serving on those boards and are more likely to segregate the board chairperson position from the CEO/president positions. Additionally, firms that voluntarily create audit committees composed of outsider members with a breadth of relevant financial reporting and audit committee knowledge and experience have boards that are larger, have more outside members, and are less likely to be chaired by the CEO/president. Implications of these findings for auditors, institutional investors, regulators, and other interested parties are discussed.