To make high-quality research more accessible and easier to explore.

Fields:
2 results

Professor Clark's Economics

Quarterly Journal of Economics 1908 22(2), 147
Professor Clark's commanding position, 147–150.—Harmless misinformation as to primitive man, 151–154.—Significance of the accumulated experience of mankind overlooked, 155–157.—The classical school and Clark are alike hedonistic, utilitarian, taxonomic, 158–160.—His doctrine as to capital and capital-goods, 161–167.—Natural distribution, final productivity, and effective utility, 168–172.—The supposition of consumer's surplus vitiates that of reward according to productivity, 173–176.—Consistently, monopolists also must be admitted to get rewards based on effective utility and so on “natural” law, 177–183.—The legislation proposed by Clark as to monopoly not related to his theoretic principles, 183–185.—How far any surplus of utiHty over disutility can be consistently reasoned out, 186–189.—Consumer's surplus and producer's surplus vanish on close examination, 190–193.—Conclusion, 194–195.

Gustav Schmoller's Economics

Quarterly Journal of Economics 1901 16(1), 69
Gustav Schmoller's Economics Get access Thorstein Veblen Thorstein Veblen The University of Chicago Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 16, Issue 1, November 1901, Pages 69–93, https://doi.org/10.2307/1882903 Published: 01 November 1901