In U.S. elections, voters often vote for candidates from different parties for president and Congress. Voters also express dissatisfaction with the performance of Congress as a whole and satisfaction with their own representative. We develop a model of split-ticket voting in which government spending is financed by uniform taxes. The benefits from this spending are concentrated. While the model generates split-ticket voting, overall spending is too high only if the president's powers are limited. Overall spending is too high in a parliamentary system. Our model can be used as the basis of an argument for term limits.

[We explore the implications of financial system design for financial innovation. We begin with assumptions about the investment opportunities of firms, their observable attributes, and the roles of commercial banks, investment banks, and the financial market. We examine the borrower's choice between bank and financial market funding, the commercial bank's choice of monitoring capacity, and the investment bank's choice of whether to invest in financial innovation. Our main result is that financial innovation in a universal banking system is stochastically lower than innovation in a financial system in which commercial and investment banks are functionally separated.]

This article builds a theory of financial system architecture. We ask: what is a financial market, what is a bank, and what determines the economic role of each? Starting with basic assumptions about primitives–the types of agents and the nature of informational asymmetries–we provide a theory that explains which agents coalesce to form banks and which trade in the capital market. It is shown that borrowers of higher observable qualities access the financial market. Moreover, a financial system in its infancy will be bank-dominated, and increased financial market sophistication diminishes bank lending.

This paper tries to explain why government bureaucracies are often associated with red tape, corruption, and lack of incentives. The paper identifies two specific ingredients that together can provide an explanation: the fact that governments often act precisely in situations where markets fail and the presence of agency problems within the government. We show that these problems are exacerbated at low levels of development and in bureaucracies dealing with poor people. We also argue that we need to posit the existence of a welfare-oriented constituency within the government in order to explain red tape and corruption.

[The quality of capacity planning significantly affects firm profitability, particularly for firms in service industries. In practice, firms use product cost data to infer the expected cost of under- and over-stocking capacity and to determine installed capacity. Theory shows that this is not optimal practice. In light of the informational and computational complexities associated with the optimal theoretical formulation, the use of product cost may be justified as a heuristic. For a multi-product, multi-resource firm, we use simulations to investigate the efficiency of four cost-based decision rules in determining the expected cost of under- and over-stocking capacity. Results indicate surprisingly high performance levels, relative to a benchmark solution. The performance of the product-based planning rule deteriorates as products increasingly share capacity resources. The opposite is true for resource-focused rules. There appears to be significant value from identifying mechanisms to balance installed capacity across resources.]