Most non-executive-directors appointed by early-stage startups are not investors in the startup, and only a small fraction are venture capital (VC) directors. Non-investor-directors and angel directors are more likely to be appointed when they possess experiences that founders lack and leverage their professional connections to attract new investors, directors, top executives, and potential acquirers for startups. Among early-stage startups that appoint nonexecutive directors, those with investor-directors experience better later-stage funding outcomes and a higher likelihood of exit, as well as file fewer patents and are more likely to exit via acquisitions rather than IPOs compared to similar startups with non-investor-directors.

We find that capital investment and net debt issuance of large firms are, on average, more sensitive to industry business cycles than those of small firms, in stark contrast to the effect of size on investment sensitivity to macroeconomic cycles. We theoretically examine the role of firm size on firms’ responses to industry shocks. Consistent with our theoretical predictions, we find that large firms exhibit greater sensitivity to industry cycles than small firms in their investment and net debt issuance only in industries with low cyclical variability of markups and production growth, high fixed cost intensity, high market-to-book, and high markups.