I. Relation between the effects of foreign trade and the structural characteristics of the national economy, 171. — Allocation of imports, 172. — Relation between "ultimate" demand and derived output and employment, 174. — Exports as an independent variable, 175. — Dependent and secondary exports, 177. — II. Formulation in precise quantitative terms, 178. — III. Relation between exports and employment in the United States in 1939: entire exports as part of final demand, including household consumption and domestic investment, 184; demand for consumers' goods not independent, 185; net terms of trade allowed for, 186. — General observations, 186.

Journal Article Distribution Methods and Costs in the U.S.A. Get access R. W. Evely R. W. Evely London Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 14, Issue 1, 1946, Pages 16–33, https://doi.org/10.2307/2295754 Published: 01 April 1946

Journal Article The Meaning of Rationality: A Note on Professor Lange's Article Get access K. W. Rothschild K. W. Rothschild Vienna Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Review of Economic Studies, Volume 14, Issue 1, 1946, Pages 50–52, https://doi.org/10.2307/2295759 Published: 01 April 1946

Introduction, 66. — Constitutional provisions and union practices: exclusion because of race, 67; exclusion because of citizenship, 72; because of political affiliations or beliefs, 75; because of creed, 76; because of sex, 77; closed unions, 78. — Exclusionary devices: initiation fees, 80; apprenticeship requirements, 82; competency tests, 83; license laws, 83; permit cards, 84. — Why do unions deny the right to join? 84. — Economic limitations on exclusionary policies, 89. — Conclusions, 91.

Journal Article Further Comment Get access K. W. Rothschild K. W. Rothschild Glasgow University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 60, Issue 4, August 1946, Pages 615–618, https://doi.org/10.2307/1885152 Published: 01 August 1946

The problem, 351. — Economic and moral aspects, 351. — "Fair wage" the core of the question, 352. — Commutative and social justice, 353. — "Ability to pay" involves a question of commutative justice, 357. — The basic principle, 357. — Examples, 359. — Modern applications, 359. — Apparent exceptions to the principle, 361. — Needless poverty of our economic philosophy, 362.

Abstract The article describes the detailed accounting procedures particularly those in effect in classifying and controlling expenditures in the U.S. Navy Department in general and the Navy Bureau of Ordnance in particular, as of January 1946. During the last two years, the Navy Department has been studying various phases of its accounting procedures with the intention of revising these procedures wherever it seemed appropriate. As a result of this study certain revisions in accounting for the expenditures of the Navy Department were placed in effect as of July 1945. No attempt will be made in this article to compare to any extent the old and the new procedures for expenditure accounting, but the procedures in effect since July 1945, will be described. The author informs that the expenditures of a federal department are subject to various controls outside the department itself. Such controls include those over the accounting classifications used to report money expended, as well as the usual control over the amount of money expended. Exclusive of the General Accounting Office, which is essentially an organization to audit expenditures of the U.S. government, the principal extra-agency controls for expenditures of the Navy Department arise from the U.S. Congress and from the U.S. Bureau of the Budget.