The British Income Tax in Recent Years Get access W. H. Price W. H. Price Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 20, Issue 2, February 1906, Pages 287–300, https://doi.org/10.2307/1883658 Published: 01 February 1906
The French Method of Controlling Railway Rates Get access W. H. Buckler W. H. Buckler Johns Hopkins University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 20, Issue 2, February 1906, Pages 279–286, https://doi.org/10.2307/1883657 Published: 01 February 1906
Journal Article The Origin of the Phrase “Balance of Trade.” Get access W. H. Price W. H. Price Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 20, Issue 1, November 1905, Pages 157–167, https://doi.org/10.2307/1882559 Published: 01 November 1905
Car Service Reform in the United States Get access W. H. Price W. H. Price Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 18, Issue 2, February 1904, Pages 299–302, https://doi.org/10.2307/1882792 Published: 01 February 1904
Introduction, 511. — Income growth and distribution, 513. — The incidence of poverty and its changes, 514. — Measuring the poverty curve, 515. — Subgroup poverty curves, 517. — Poverty status of population subgroups, 1959, 519. — The elasticity of subgroup incomes with respect to economic growth, 521. — Conclusions, 523.
Journal Article Forecasting Uses of Anticipatory Data: Comment Get access W. H. Locke Anderson W. H. Locke Anderson Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 73, Issue 1, February 1959, Pages 169–170, https://doi.org/10.2307/1883831 Published: 01 February 1959
Restricted voting control comparatively recent, 353. — I. Non-voting industrial stocks. Preferred issues, 357. — Common stock, 360. — II. Contingent voting industrial stocks; their importance and characteristics, 362. — Non-voting contingent voting issues, 364. — Non-voting with exceptions — contingent voting, 364. Non-voting for directors — contingent voting, 366. — Full voting — contingent voting, 367. — III. Conditions which render operative the contingent voting rights. Dividend defaults, 367. — Other contingencies, 372. — IV. Extent of contingent voting control when operative. Exclusive voting, 374. — Extra voting, 375. — Full voting, 376. — Exclusive voting for directors, 377. — Contingent voting common shares, 378. — V. Railroad and public utility non-voting and contingent voting stocks: Utilities, 378; Railroads, 381. — VI. Arguments for and against non-voting stocks, 382. — Advisable to prohibit strictly non-voting issues, 385. — Ineffectiveness of full voting rights to prevent centralized voting control, 386. — VII. Conclusion. Advantages of strong contingent voting issues, 388.
J. W. Elliott, H. L. Uphoff, Predicting the Near Term Profit and Loss Statement with an Econometric Model: A Feasibility Study, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 10, No. 2 (Autumn, 1972), pp. 259-274