When firms experience financial distress, equity holders may act strategically, forcing concessions from debtholders and paying less than the originally contracted interest payments. This article incorporates strategic debt service in a standard, continuous time asset pricing model, developing simple closed-form expressions for debt and equity values. The authors find that strategic debt service can account for a substantial proportion of the premium on risky corporate debt. They analyze the efficiency implications of strategic debt service, showing that it can eliminate both direct bankruptcy costs and agency costs of debt.

When firms experience financial distress, equity holders may act strategically, forcing concessions from debtholders and paying less than the originally‐contracted interest payments. This article incorporates strategic debt service in a standard, continuous time asset pricing model, developing simple closed‐form expressions for debt and equity values. We find that strategic debt service can account for a substantial proportion of the premium on risky corporate debt. We analyze the efficiency implications of strategic debt service, showing that it can eliminate both direct bankruptcy costs and agency costs of debt.

When should regulators close a financially ailing bank? FDIC practice in the US has moved in the direction of early closure. In contrast, banking regulators in Japan continue to follow a more patient approach. This paper analyses a series of models in which closure rules and bailout policies arise endogenously through the interaction of (i) regulators' attempts to minimize discounted, expected bankruptcy costs, and (ii) equity-holders' incentives to recapitalise banks. We characterize subsidy policies for distressed banks that implement socially optimal closure rules at minimum financial cost to regulators and which reduce moral hazard.

This article shows (1) how entry and exit of firms in a competitive industry affect the valuation of securities and optimal capital structure, and (2) how, given a trade-off between tax advantages and agency costs, a firm will optimally adjust its leverage level after it is set up. We derive simple pricing expressions for corporate debt in which the price elasticity of demand for industry output plays a crucial role. When a firm optimally adjusts its leverage over time, we show that total firm value comprises the value of discounted cash flows assuming fixed capital structure, plus a continuum of options for marginal increases in debt.