Our study examines the pricing of private placements for issuing firms subject to outstanding loan covenants. Using Private Investments in Public Equity (PIPE) deals from 2001 to 2018, we find that issuing firms restricted by loan covenants offer a discount of 3.9% larger than those without covenants. We corroborate the positive impact of financial covenants on discounts through channel tests that assess covenant violation history, covenant strictness, and the identities of lead PIPE investors. The increased probability of technical default and costly renegotiation in covenants potentially incentivizes borrowing firms to transition from the loan market to the PIPE market. To minimize endogeneity concerns, we use a matched sample, a Heckman selection model, and a two-stage least squares instrumental variable analysis, all of which present consistent results. Based on our findings, we conjecture that PIPE investors are concerned about the transfer of control rights to lenders and, as a result, demand deeper discounts in PIPE offerings.

We analyze PIPE (Private Investments in Public Equity) transactions in which the issuer experienced class action lawsuits. We explain the associated information effects measured by the announcement wealth effects and the discounts. Using a comprehensive, hand-gathered dataset, we show that the more severely litigated PIPEs are associated with higher announcement wealth effects and higher levels of discounts. We find that the issuer's voluntary disclosure positively influences PIPE information effects particularly when coupled with auditor changes. We report that certain mitigation actions affect the pricing of PIPEs along with their associated wealth effects while facing ongoing litigation. We posit that confidentiality in privately negotiated securities is the key in litigated transactions as issuers efficiently share the operational details of mitigation efforts. PIPE transactions are not necessarily costlier funding venues even when securities class action lawsuits are ongoing compared to the PIPE transactions that did not experience any prior litigation action.