Although the impacts of air pollution on individual health are well documented, it is unclear whether and how air pollution affects firm strategy on employee treatment. This study examines this issue in the context of China and presents strong evidence that air pollution significantly enhances employee treatment. To establish causality, we further instrument for air pollution using thermal inversions, introduce a regression discontinuity approach relying on the Huai River boundary, and a falsification test. Monetary compensation, safety security, and career training jointly determine our findings. Two plausible mechanisms are corporate brain drain and public attention. Our results are more pronounced for non-state-owned firms, and firms with less financial constraints, intensive R&D or competition, and increased job market opportunities. Overall, we highlight that air pollution is an important noneconomic factor driving firms' human capital and employee treatment strategy.

Using multiple measures of attack proximity, we show that CEOs employed at firms located near terrorist attacks earn an average pay increase of 12% after the attack relative to CEOs at firms located far from attacks. CEOs at terrorist attack-proximate firms prefer cash-based compensation increases (e.g., salary and bonus) over equity-based compensation (e.g., options and stocks granted). The effect is causal and it is larger when the bargaining power of the CEO is high. Other executives and workers do not receive a terrorist attack premium.