← Search

American Economic Review Vol. 102 No. 3 2012

Prediction with Misspecified Models

John Geweke1; Gianni Amisano2

1 Centre for the Study of Choice, University of Technology Sydney, 645 Harris St., Ultimo NSW 2007 Australia. · 2 European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, 60311 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Abstract

The assumption that one of a set of prediction models is a literal description of reality formally underlies many formal econometric methods, including Bayesian model averaging and most approaches to model selection. Prediction pooling does not invoke this assumption and leads to predictions that improve on those based on Bayesian model averaging, as assessed by the log predictive score. The paper shows that the improvement is substantial using a pool consisting of a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, a vector autoregression, and a dynamic factor model, in conjunction with standard US postwar quarterly macroeconomic time series.

DOI
10.1257/aer.102.3.482
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
482-486
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref openalex

Cite