← Search

American Economic Review Vol. 114 No. 12 2024

Contamination Bias in Linear Regressions

Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham1; Peter Hull2; Michal Kolesár3

1 Yale University (email: ) · 2 Brown University (email: ) · 3 Princeton University (email: )

Abstract

We study regressions with multiple treatments and a set of controls that is flexible enough to purge omitted variable bias. We show these regressions generally fail to estimate convex averages of heterogeneous treatment effects—instead, estimates of each treatment’s effect are contaminated by nonconvex averages of the effects of other treatments. We discuss three estimation approaches that avoid such contamination bias, including the targeting of easiest-to-estimate weighted average effects. A reanalysis of nine empirical applications finds economically and statistically meaningful contamination bias in observational studies; contamination bias in experimental studies is more limited due to smaller variability in propensity scores.

DOI
10.1257/aer.20221116
Volume
114
Issue
12
Pages
4015-4051
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite