← Search

American Economic Review Vol. 95 No. 4 2005

Optimal Expectations

Markus K. Brunnermeier1; Jonathan A. Parker2

1 Department of Economics, Bendheim Center for Finance, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544. · 2 Department of Economics, Bendheim Center for Finance, and Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.

Abstract

Forward-looking agents care about expected future utility flows, and hence have higher current felicity if they are optimistic. This paper studies utility-based biases in beliefs by supposing that beliefs maximize average felicity, optimally balancing this benefit of optimism against the costs of worse decision making. A small optimistic bias in beliefs typically leads to first-order gains in anticipatory utility and only second-order costs in realized outcomes. In a portfolio choice example, investors overestimate their return and exhibit a preference for skewness; in general equilibrium, investors' prior beliefs are endogenously heterogeneous. In a consumption-saving example, consumers are both overconfident and overoptimistic.

DOI
10.1257/0002828054825493
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
1092-1118
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite