← Search

American Economic Review Vol. 105 No. 5 2015

More Money, More Problems? Can High Pay be Coercive and Repugnant?

Sandro Ambuehl; Muriel Niederle; Alvin E. Roth

Stanford University, 597 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305 (e-mail: )

open access

Abstract

IRBs can disallow high incentives they deem coercive. A vignette study on MTurk concerning participation in medical trials shows that a substantial minority of subjects concurs. They think high incentives cause more regret, and that more people would be better off without the opportunity to participate. We model observers as judging the ethicality of incentives by partially using their own utility. The model predicts that payments are repugnant only to the extent that they affect the participation decision, and more so for larger transactions. Incentivizing poorer participants is more repugnant, and in-kind incentives are less repugnant than monetary incentives.

DOI
10.1257/aer.p20151034
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
357-360
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite