← Search

American Economic Review Vol. 90 No. 2 2000

Two Generalizations of a Deposit–Refund System

Don Fullerton1; Ann Wolverton2

1 Department of Economics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-1173, and the National Bureau of Economic Research. · 2 ICF Consulting, 9300 Lee Highway, Fairfax, VA 22031-1207.

Abstract

This paper suggests two generalizations of the deposit-refund idea. In the first, we apply the idea not just to solid waste materials, but to any waste from production or consumption including wastes that may be solid, gaseous, or liquid. Using a simple general equilibrium model, we derive the optimal combination of a tax on a purchased commodity and subsidy to a clean' activity (such as emission abatement, recycling, or disposal in a sanitary landfill). This two-part instrument' is equivalent to a Pigovian tax on the dirty' activity (such as emissions, dumping, or litter). In the second generalization, we consider the case where government must use distorting taxes on labor and capital incomes. To help meet the revenue requirement, would the optimal deposit be raised and the refund reduced? We derive the second-best revenue-raising DRS or two-part instrument to answer that question.

DOI
10.1257/aer.90.2.238
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
238-242
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex openalex crossref

Cite