← Search

Econometrica Vol. 89 No. 4 2021

Redistribution Through Markets

Piotr Dworczak1; Scott Duke Kominers2,3,4; Mohammad Akbarpour5

1 Department of Economics, Northwestern University · 2 Entrepreneurial Management Unit, Harvard Business School · 3 Department of Economics and Center of Mathematical Sciences and Applications, Harvard University · 4 National Bureau of Economic Research · 5 Graduate School of Business, Stanford University

Abstract

Policymakers frequently use price regulations as a response to inequality in the markets they control. In this paper, we examine the optimal structure of such policies from the perspective of mechanism design. We study a buyer‐seller market in which agents have private information about both their valuations for an indivisible object and their marginal utilities for money. The planner seeks a mechanism that maximizes agents' total utilities, subject to incentive and market‐clearing constraints. We uncover the constrained Pareto frontier by identifying the optimal trade‐off between allocative efficiency and redistribution. We find that competitive‐equilibrium allocation is not always optimal. Instead, when there is inequality across sides of the market, the optimal design uses a tax‐like mechanism, introducing a wedge between the buyer and seller prices, and redistributing the resulting surplus to the poorer side of the market via lump‐sum payments. When there is significant same‐side inequality that can be uncovered by market behavior, it may be optimal to impose price controls even though doing so induces rationing.

DOI
10.3982/ecta16671
Volume
89
Issue
4
Pages
1665-1698
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite