← Search

Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 40 No. 4 2002

Performance Impact of the Elimination of Direct Labor Variance Reporting: A Field Study

Rajiv D. Banker1; Sarv Devaraj2; Roger G. Schroeder3,4; Kingshuk K. Sinha3,4

1 The University of Texas at Dallas · 2 University of Notre Dame · 3 University of Minnesota · 4 University of Minnesota System

Abstract

Using a field study approach, we examine two competing perspectives on direct labor variance reporting: some argue that direct labor variance reporting is costly and cumbersome, and should be eliminated; whereas others contend that without direct labor variance information, managers will not be able to monitor workers effectively, causing workers to shirk and worker productivity to decline. Specifically, we investigate the productivity and quality impacts of eliminating direct labor variance reporting with panel data containing 36 months of data from seven experimental plants that eliminated direct labor variance reporting and 11 control plants that did not. The experimental plants experienced a significant decline in labor productivity compared to the control plants. Also, the experimental plants showed an improvement in product quality, indicating that workers reallocate their efforts to other tasks as a result of the change in the information set available to evaluate them.

DOI
10.1111/1475-679x.00080
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
1013-1036
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite