← Search

Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 62 No. 1 2024

Audit Partners’ Role in Material Misstatement Resolution: Survey and Interview Evidence

Eldar Maksymov1; Mark E. Peecher2; Andrew Sutherland3; Joseph Weber3

1 W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University · 2 Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign · 3 Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

open access

Abstract

Auditors are expected to identify and resolve material misstatements (MMs) in management's financial statements. However, beyond the audit opinion, the audit process is opaque. To address this, we independently survey 462 audit partners and interview 24 audit partners, CFOs, and audit committee members on how partners assess and address MM risk, resolve MMs, and the consequences of MMs. Partners identify MMs in approximately 9% (15%) of public (private) engagements and use qualitative factors to waive apparent MMs. Loan covenant and going‐concern issues increase MM risk more than earnings benchmark issues. Partners point to a variety of both auditor and client factors as threats to audit effectiveness. Partners often rely on rapport with management and involve the national office and audit committee in resolving MMs. Partner incentives around restatements are context specific. Our results provide new insights into the auditor's role in financial reporting that are relevant to academics, practitioners, and regulators.

DOI
10.1111/1475-679x.12506
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
275-333
Language
en
Sources
openalex bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref

Cite