← Search

Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 52 No. 3 2014

Options in Compensation: Promises and Pitfalls

Christian Riis Flor1; Hans Frimor2; Claus Munk3

1 University of Southern Denmark · 2 Aarhus University · 3 Copenhagen Business School

Abstract

We derive the optimal compensation contract in a principal–agent setting in which outcome is used to provide incentives for both effort and risky investments. To motivate investment, optimal compensation entails rewards for high as well as low outcomes, and it is increasing at the mean outcome to motivate effort. If rewarding low outcomes is infeasible, compensation consisting of stocks and options is a near‐efficient means of overcoming the manager's induced aversion to undertaking risky investments, whereas stock compensation is not. However, stock plus option compensation may induce excessively risky investments, and capping pay can be important in curbing such behavior.

DOI
10.1111/1475-679x.12049
Volume
52
Issue
3
Pages
703-732
Language
en
Sources
openalex bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref

Cite