← Search

Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 62 No. 3 2024

Fraud Power Laws

Edwige Cheynel1; Davide Cianciaruso2; Frank Zhou3

1 Olin Business School Washington University · 2 New Economic School · 3 The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

Using misstatement data, we find that the distribution of detected fraud features a heavy tail. We propose a theoretical mechanism that explains such a relatively high frequency of extreme frauds. In our dynamic model, a manager manipulates earnings for personal gain. A monitor of uncertain quality can detect fraud and punish the manager. As the monitor fails to detect fraud, the manager's posterior belief about the monitor's effectiveness decreases. Over time, the manager's learning leads to a slippery slope, in which the size of frauds grows steeply, and to a power law for detected fraud. Empirical analyses corroborate the slippery slope and the learning channel. As a policy implication, we establish that a higher detection intensity can increase fraud by enabling the manager to identify an ineffective monitor more quickly. Further, nondetection of frauds below a materiality threshold, paired with a sufficiently steep punishment scheme, can prevent large frauds.

DOI
10.1111/1475-679x.12520
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
833-876
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref bibtex:phds-export.bib

Cite