← Search

Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 57 No. 1 2019

Relative Target Setting and Cooperation

Martin Holzhacker1; Stephan Kramer2; Michal Matějka3; NICK HOFFMEISTER4

1 Michigan State University · 2 Erasmus University Rotterdam · 3 Arizona State University · 4 Independent

open access

Abstract

A large stream of work on relative performance evaluation highlights the benefits of using information about peer performance in contracting. In contrast, the potential costs of discouraging cooperation among peers have received much less attention. The purpose of our study is to examine how the importance of cooperation affects the use of information about peer performance in target setting, also known as relative target setting. Specifically, we use data from an industrial services company where business unit managers need to share specialized equipment and staff with their peers to manage bottlenecks in their capacity. We construct several empirical proxies for the costs and benefits of information about peer performance and examine their effects on target setting. We find robust evidence that the sensitivity of target revisions to past peer performance is higher when peer group performance has greater capacity to filter out noise but lower when the importance of cooperation among peers is greater.

DOI
10.1111/1475-679x.12244
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
211-239
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref bibtex:phds-export.bib

Cite