← Search

Journal of Banking & Finance Vol. 37 No. 2 2013

What determines corporate pension fund risk-taking strategy?

Heng An1; Zhaodan Huang2; Ting Zhang3

1 University of South Dakota · 2 Utica College · 3 University of Dayton

Abstract

Corporate sponsors of defined benefit pension plans generally assume low investment risk when they have low funding ratios and high default risk, consistent with the risk management hypothesis. However, for financially distressed sponsors and sponsors that freeze, terminate, or convert defined benefit to defined contribution plans, the risk-shifting incentive (moral hazard) dominates. Pension fund risk-taking is also affected by labor unionization and sponsor incentives to maximize tax benefits, restore financial slack, and justify the accounting choices of pension assumptions. Sponsors shift toward an aggressive risk strategy when their pension plans emerge from underfunding, bankruptcy risk is reduced, or marginal tax rate decreases. Overall, we show that corporate sponsors adopt a dynamic risk-taking strategy in their pension fund investments.

DOI
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.018
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
597-613
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref bibtex:phds-export.bib

Cite