← Search

Journal of Banking & Finance Vol. 31 No. 4 2007

Evaluating the Nordea experiment: Evidence from market and accounting data

Lawrence G. Goldberg1; Richard J. Sweeney2; Clas G. Wihlborg3

1 University of Miami · 2 Georgetown University · 3 Copenhagen Business School

open access

Abstract

This paper discusses results and difficulties of comparing banks’ performance based on publicly available data for the case of Nordea, a pan-Nordic bank created through mergers of important national banks. The objective is to determine whether Nordea’s unique strategy of functional integration across four countries can be advantageous. For stock-market data, however, Nordea does not have stable betas on risk factors, and thus the comparables method must be used with great care. The Nordea holding company performed about as well as the comparables, both in terms of stock-market and accounting data. Nordea banks in individual countries outperformed comparable holding companies; by arithmetic, Nordea non-bank operations are not as profitable as its bank operations. In event studies, the data lend only the weakest support to the hypothesis that the market viewed Nordea’s acquisitions as adding value.

DOI
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.10.010
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
1265-1286
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref bibtex:phds-export.bib

Cite