← Search

Journal of Banking & Finance Vol. 149 2023

How informative are insider trades and analyst recommendations?

Jim Hsieh1; Lilian Ng2; Qinghai Wang3

1 George Mason University · 2 York University · 3 University of Central Florida

open access

Abstract

This study evaluates the interactions between, and informativeness of, insider trading and analyst recommendations. We find that analyst recommendations significantly affect subsequent insider trading, but not vice versa. Surprisingly, in aggregate, insiders buy more shares following analyst downgrades and sell more shares following upgrades. This pattern persists even after controlling for analysts’ momentum and insiders’ contrarian trading preferences. Analysts, in contrast, do not systematically take into account insider trading when revising their recommendations. More importantly, we show that these two information signals complement each other although insider buying could be a singularly strong signal that substitutes the informativeness of analyst recommendations under certain circumstances. Overall, our findings highlight the important dynamics and financial market consequences between the two crucial groups of information providers.

DOI
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106787
Volume
149
Pages
106787
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite