← Search

Journal of Banking & Finance Vol. 33 No. 12 2009

Firm performance and mutual fund voting

Lilian Ng1,2; Qinghai Wang3,4,5; Nataliya S. Zaiats6,7

1 York University · 2 University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · 3 Florida College · 4 Georgia Institute of Technology · 5 University of Central Florida · 6 Simmons University · 7 Suffolk University

Abstract

We employ a new comprehensive proxy voting records database to investigate whether mutual funds consider prior firm performance when they vote on a diverse range of management- and shareholder-sponsored proposals relating to governance, compensation, and director election. We argue that prior firm performance plays a role in the monitoring effort of mutual funds as they fulfill their fiduciary duties. Results show that voting is related to prior firm performance for selected management and shareholder proposals and that it is consistent with Institutional Shareholder Services’ recommendations. Mutual funds support management (shareholder) proposals less (more) when prior firm performance has been weak. Furthermore, even when mutual funds deviate from their fund family’s voting policies, they attach importance to prior firm performance, and their voting is, to a certain degree, affected by business ties.

DOI
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.05.025
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
2207-2217
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite