← Search

Journal of Corporate Finance Vol. 31 2015

Top VC IPO underpricing

Daniel Bradley1; Incheol Kim2,3; Laurie Krigman4

1 University of South Florida · 2 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute · 3 The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley · 4 Babson College

open access

Abstract

Before the IPO bubble burst, the first day return for IPOs backed by top VC firms was double that of non-top VC IPOs. Top VC IPOs were also twice as likely to receive all-star analyst coverage and suffered twice as large negative returns upon lockup expiration. We argue that this was not a coincidence. Underwriters benefited from underpricing vis-à-vis allocation strategies whereas VCs gain from information momentum which allows them to cash-out at higher prices at lockup expiration. All-stars are a scarce resource underwriters allocate to their best clients (top VCs) who bring them repeat business. Post-bubble, regulatory shocks restricted preferential IPO allocations and reduced the value of all-star coverage. Consequently, these relations disappeared indicating that regulatory changes likely had the desired effect.

DOI
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.016
Volume
31
Pages
186-202
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite