← Search

Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 124 No. 2 2017

Compensation goals and firm performance

Benjamin Bennett1; J. Carr Bettis2; Radhakrishnan Gopalan3; Todd T. Milbourn3

1 Fisher College · 2 Arizona State University · 3 Washington University in St. Louis

Abstract

Using a large data set of performance goals employed in executive incentive contracts, we find that a disproportionately large number of firms exceed their goals by a small margin as compared to the number that fall short of the goal by a similar margin. This asymmetry is particularly acute for earnings goals, when compensation is contingent on a single goal, when the pay-performance relationship around the goal is concave-shaped, and for grants with non-equity-based payouts. Firms that exceed their compensation target by a small margin are more likely to beat the target the next period and CEOs of firms that miss their targets are more likely to experience a forced turnover. Firms that just exceed their Earnings Per Share (EPS) goals have higher abnormal accruals and lower Research and Development (R&D) expenditures, and firms that just exceed their profit goals have lower Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) expenditures. Overall, our results highlight some of the costs of linking managerial compensation to specific compensation targets.

DOI
10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.01.010
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
307-330
Language
en
Sources
openalex crossref bibtex:phds-export.bib

Cite