← Search

Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 12 No. 2 1983

Warrant valuation and exercise strategy

David C. Emanuel

The University of Texas at Dallas

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that warrant valuation and exercise strategy differ fundamentally from call option valuation. Simultaneous exercise of warrants is shown to be suboptimal and a monopolist owning all warrants can achieve a higher value. Unless warrants are perfectly divisible, no satisfactory equilibrium exists for the valuation and exercise of widely held warrants. The problems encountered appear to be quite general and stem from necessary assumptions about future corporate dividend policy and capital structure. Such assumptions are necessary for any model of corporate security valuation.

DOI
10.1016/0304-405x(83)90036-3
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
211-235
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite