← Search

Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 138 No. 2 2020

Is conflicted investment advice better than no advice?

John Chalmers1; Jonathan Reuter2,3

1 University of Oregon · 2 National Bureau of Economic Research · 3 Boston College

Abstract

The benefit of investment advice depends on the quality of advice and the investor's counterfactual portfolio. We use changes in the Oregon University System Optional Retirement Plan to highlight the impact of plan design on the counterfactual portfolios of advice seekers. When brokers are available and target date funds (TDFs) are not, brokers help participants with high predicted demand for advice bear market risk, but they recommend higher-commission options. When brokers are removed and TDFs are added, new high-predicted-demand participants primarily invest in TDFs, which offer similar market risk but higher Sharpe ratios than the broker-advised portfolios within our sample.

DOI
10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.05.005
Volume
138
Issue
2
Pages
366-387
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite