Journal of Financial Intermediation Vol. 15 No. 1 2006

Agency conflicts, ownership concentration, and legal shareholder protection

Mike Burkart^1,2,3; Fausto Panunzi^1,2,4,5,6

¹ Center for Economic and Policy Research · ² European Corporate Governance Institute · ³ Stockholm School of Economics · ⁴ University of Bologna · ⁵ Bocconi University · ⁶ Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract

This paper analyzes the interaction between legal shareholder protection, managerial incentives, monitoring, and ownership concentration. Legal protection affects the expropriation of shareholders and the blockholder's incentives to monitor. Because monitoring weakens managerial incentives, both effects jointly determine the relationship between legal protection and ownership concentration. When legal protection facilitates monitoring better laws strengthen the monitoring incentives, and ownership concentration and legal protection are inversely related. By contrast, when legal protection and monitoring are substitutes better laws weaken the monitoring incentives, and the relationship between legal protection and ownership concentration is non-monotone. This holds irrespective of whether or not the large shareholder can reap private benefits. Moreover, better legal protection may exacerbate rather than alleviate the conflict of interest between large and small shareholders.

DOI

10.1016/j.jfi.2004.12.004

Volume

15

Issue

1

Pages

1-31

Language

en

Sources

bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite

APA 7 MLA 9 Chicago (author–date) Harvard Elsevier Harvard (JFE, JBF…) The Accounting Review Academy of Management American Marketing Association INFORMS (Management Science) Copy citation Copied ✓