Journal of Financial Stability Vol. 1 No. 3 2005
Comment on “Do credit rating agencies add to the dynamics of emerging market crises?” by Roman Kräussl
Abstract
Possible explanations are provided for two basic results in Kräussl's paper. First, rating effect may be stronger in emerging markets because they are less transparent. Transparency is interpreted in the context of Knightian uncertainty and institutional quality. Emerging markets have lower institutional quality ratings and present greater uncertainty than mature markets, therefore, they are more susceptible to rating agencies’ evaluations. Some empirical evidence on the correlations between institutional quality rankings and portfolio investment is presented. Second, sovereign credit downgrades generate a stronger market reaction than upgrades because decision makers value losses more than gains, as posited by cumulative prospect theory.
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jfs.2005.02.008
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438-446
- Language
- en
- Sources
- bibtex:phds-export.bib crossref openalex