← Search

Journal of Financial Stability Vol. 74 2024

Lobbying and liquidity requirements: Large versus small banks

Oz Shy1; Rune Stenbacka2

1 Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta · 2 Hanken School of Economics

Abstract

We design a model with banks of unequal size operating subject to liquidity requirements in an imperfectly-competitive deposit market. We show that large banks have stronger incentives than small ones to lobby in order to relax the liquidity requirements unless they bear significantly higher lobbying costs. Therefore, lobbying magnifies asymmetries between banks. Furthermore, we establish that the organization of influence activities matters. An industry-wide bank association for lobbying to relax the liquidity requirements suffers from an internal conflict of interest and cannot simultaneously benefit both large and small banks if these have identical lobbying cost functions.

DOI
10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101316
Volume
74
Pages
101316
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite