← Search

Journal of Financial Stability Vol. 9 No. 4 2013

A theory of failed bank resolution: Technological change and political economics

Robert DeYoung1; Michal Kowalik2; Jack Reidhill3

1 University of Kansas · 2 Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City · 3 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Abstract

We model the failed bank resolution process as a repeated game between a utility-maximizing government resolution authority (RA) and a profit-maximizing banking industry. Limits to resolution technology and political/economic pressure create incentives for the RA to bail out failed complex banks; the inability of the RA to credibly commit to closing these banks creates an incentive for bank complexity. We solve the game in mixed strategies and find equilibrium conditions remarkably descriptive of government responses to actual and potential large bank insolvencies during the recent financial crisis. The central role of the technology constraint in this model highlights a crucial determinant of failed bank resolution policy that has been overlooked in the theory literature to date; without improved resolution technologies, future bank bailouts are inevitable. The effects of political pressure in this model remind us that regulatory reform (e.g., Dodd-Frank) is only as good as the regulators that implement the reform.

DOI
10.1016/j.jfs.2012.09.003
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
612-627
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite