← Search

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Vol. 44 No. 1 2009

Understanding the Penalties Associated with Corporate Misconduct: An Empirical Examination of Earnings and Risk

Deborah L. Murphy1; Ronald E. Shrieves1; Samuel L. Tibbs2,3

1 University of Tennessee at Knoxville · 2 East Carolina University · 3 American University of Sharjah

Abstract

We examine the relationship between allegations of corporate misconduct and changes in profitability and risk of the alleged offender. Profitability is measured as reported earnings and analysts’ earnings forecasts. Risk is measured as stock return volatility and concordance among analysts’ forecasts. Decreases in earnings and increases in risk are found to accompany allegations of misconduct, and although the results are somewhat sensitive to the earnings and risk metrics used, the changes are found to be consistently greater for related-party offenses. The importance of reputational penalties is underscored by analysis of the association between allegation-related changes in firm value and changes in earnings and risk.

DOI
10.1017/s0022109009090036
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
55-83
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite