← Search

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Vol. 59 No. 4 2024

The Use of Peer Groups in Setting Director Compensation: Competition for Talent Versus Self-Serving Behavior

Sheng-Syan Chen1; Cheng-Yi Chien2; Chia-Wei Huang3

1 National Taiwan University · 2 Feng Chia University · 3 National Chengchi University

Abstract

Recent Delaware Chancery Court decisions that boards are self-interested in setting director compensation have focused scrutiny on the pay-setting process used by corporations. We examine the effect of peer benchmarking on director compensation decisions. Director pay relates positively to peer director pay, and firms paying their directors highly are selected as peers. Moreover, firm performance and board advising performance are positively related to the talent component and are generally unrelated to the self-serving component of the peer pay effect. The evidence indicates that firms use peer benchmarking to justify high compensation mainly to attract talented directors to enhance board quality.

DOI
10.1017/s002210902300039x
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
1886-1925
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite