← Search

Journal of Labor Economics Vol. 42 No. 2 2024

Welfare versus Work under a Negative Income Tax: Evidence from the Gary, Seattle, Denver, and Manitoba Income Maintenance Experiments

Chris Riddell1; W. Craig Riddell2,3

1 University of Waterloo · 2 University of British Columbia · 3 IZA - Institute of Labor Economics

Abstract

The income maintenance experiments have received renewed attention due to growing international interest in a basic income. Proponents of a negative income tax (NIT) viewed it as a replacement for traditional welfare with stronger work incentives. However, existing labor supply estimates for single mothers (those eligible for welfare) are uniformly negative. We reassess the experimental evidence and find randomization failure in two NITs (Gary and Seattle). In Denver and Manitoba, we find positive labor supply responses for those on welfare before random assignment. Our results provide strong evidence that an NIT can increase work activity among single mothers on welfare.

DOI
10.1086/723706
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
427-467
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite