← Search

Journal of Political Economy Vol. 126 No. 4 2018

Incentives in Experiments: A Theoretical Analysis

Yaron Azrieli1; Christopher P. Chambers2; Paul J. Healy1

1 The Ohio State University · 2 Georgetown University

Abstract

Experimental economists currently lack a convention for how to pay subjects in experiments with multiple tasks. We provide a theoretical framework for analyzing this question. Assuming statewise monotonicity and nothing else, we prove that paying for one randomly chosen problem—the random problem selection mechanism—is essentially the only incentive compatible mechanism. Paying for every period is similarly justified when we assume only a “no complementarities at the top” condition. To help experimenters decide which is appropriate for their particular experiment, we discuss empirical tests of these two assumptions.

DOI
10.1086/698136
Volume
126
Issue
4
Pages
1472-1503
Language
en
Sources
bibtex:phds-export.bib openalex crossref

Cite